Technical, Economic, and Political Feasibility of Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Options
Citation: Summary of talk presented to Congressional staff on 24 April, 2006 Document: Click to download
Nuclear waste produced in the 20th and 21st centuries will require active management by future generations well into the 22nd century and beyond. Current U.S. law on direct placement in an underground repository requires a start next year on the politically infeasible siting of a second permanent underground repository east of the Mississippi river. Each repository would be sealed after the emplaced fuel is air cooled for about 300 years. In order of increasing technical challenge and cost, three alternative options for spent nuclear reactor fuel management are these:
- Air-cooled storage on aging pads for 100 years. .
- Prompt reprocessing to make mixed plutonium-uranium oxide (MOX) fuel to be burnt only once in existing reactors.
- Multiple rounds or continuous reprocessing and burning in liquid-metal-cooled reactors to substantially reduce the required final repository volume.
|
This document is classified within these themes: Waste Management
This document is directly associated with the following: |
Events
Members Clifford Singer Professor of Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering and of Political Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
|
|
|